GEOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION ON GROUND SETTLEMENT AND THE STABILITY OF THE OVERLYING STRATA IN A COAL-BEARING FORMATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2080/2026-7-29

Keywords:

underground coal gasification, pillar stability, surface subsidence, thin coal seam gasification, safety pillar width.

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a clean, unmanned coal extraction technology with great potential. The main environmental hazards hindering the widespread adoption of this technology include a high risk of surface subsidence, flooding, and water contamination due to the fracturing and displacement of overlying strata above the reactor cavities. The formation of cavities because of gasification causes a redistribution of stresses in the surrounding rock, triggers the growth of existing cracks and the formation of new ones, leading to the collapse of the reactor roof, inelastic deformation of the roof rock, and the inflow of groundwater into the reactors. To address these issues, it is essential to ensure the stability of the rock mass above the UCG reactor cavities. This study analyzes the impact of underground coal gasification on overlying strata and the Earth’s surface. To model the behavior of rocks during the gasification of a thin coal seam, the parallel CMBP method and the finite element method were applied in the ANSYS environment, which made it possible to determine the stress-strain state and temperature distribution in the surrounding rocks. The results showed that, provided the bearing capacity of the safety pillars is maintained, surface subsidence and rock displacement remain within acceptable limits, ensuring a minimal risk of negative impact from gasification on the surface. Under the gasification of a 1.05-meterthick formation at a depth of 392–465 meters, vertical surface settlements did not exceed 46 mm for a 3.75-meterwide section and 27 mm for a 15.0-meter-wide pillar, and the height of the stress change zone above the cavity did not exceed 70 meters. The collapse of the pillars between gasification cavities leads to a significant increase in subsidence–by 11.7 and 19.9 times, respectively–which threatens the integrity of aquifers and surface infrastructure

References

Klimenko A. Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution. Energies. 2009. Vol.2 (2). P. 456–476. https://doi.org/10.3390/en20200456

Shafirovich E., Varma A. Underground Coal Gasification: A Brief Review of Current Status. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009. Vol. 48, no. 17. P. 7865–7875. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801569r

Burton E., Friedmann J., Upadhye R. Best practices in underground coal gasification (Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2006.

Couch G. Underground coal gasification (CCC/151). IEA Clean Coal Centre. 2009.

Sarhosis V., Yang D., Sheng Y., Kempka T. Coupled hydro-thermal analysis of underground coal gasification reactor cool down for subsequent CO₂ storage. Energy Procedia. 2013. Vol. 40. Р. 428–436.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.08.049

Sury M., White M., Lucas C. Review of underground coal gasification technologies and practices. DTI Cleaner Coal Technology Programme. 2004.

Imran M., Kumar D., Kumar N., Qayyum A., Saeed A. Environmental concerns of underground coal gasification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014. Vol. 31. Р. 600–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.025

Najafi M., Jalali S. M. E., KhaloKakaie, R. Thermal– mechanical– numerical analysis of stress distribution in the vicinity of underground coal gasification (UCG) panels. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2014. Vol. 134. Р. 1-16.

Sirdesai N. N., Singh R., Singh T. N., Ranjith P. G. Numerical and experimental study of strata behavior and land subsidence in an underground coal gasification project. Proc. IAHS. 2016. Vol. 372. Р. 455–462.https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-372-455-2015

Akbarzadeh H., Chalaturnyk R. J. Structural changes in coal at elevated temperature pertinent to underground coal gasification: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2014. Vol. 131. Р. 126–146.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2014.06.009

Buscheck T. E., Kuder T., Philip R., Kolhatkar R., Klinchuch L. Two-dimensional compound-specific isotope analysis to assess remediation system effectiveness, in situ and on-site bioremediation. Tenth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium. Baltimore, MD, United States, 2009.

Corkum A. G., Board M. P. Numerical analysis of longwall mining layout for a Wyoming trona mine. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2016. Vol. 89. P. 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.09.001

Seifi M., Chen Z., Abedi J. Large scale simulation of UCG process applying porous medium approach. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2015. Vol. 93. P. 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22218

Lozynskyi V., Falshtynskyi V., Kozhantov A., Kieush L., Saik P. Increasing the underground coal gasification efficiency using preliminary electromagnetic coal mass heating. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.2024. Vol. 1348. P. 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012045/

Wang X., Zhang Q., Yuan L. A coupled thermal-force-chemical-displacement multi-field model for underground coal gas-ification based on controlled retraction injection point technology and its thermal analysis.Energy. 2024. Vol. 130614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130614

Yang D., Sarhosis V., Sheng Y. Thermal–mechanical modelling around the cavities of underground coal gasification. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2014. Vol. 87(4). P. 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2014.03.029

Zha X.X., Wang H.Y., Cheng S.S. Finite element analysis of the subsidence of cap rocks during underground coal gasi-fication process. Advanced Materials Research. 2014. Vol. 859. P. 91-94. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.859.91

Lee K., Nam J., Park J., Hong G. Numerical Analysis of Factors Influencing the Ground Surface Settlement above a Cavity. Materials. 2022. Vol. 15(23). P. 8301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238301

Liu X., Xu L., Zhang K. Strata movement characteristics in underground coal gasification (UCG) under thermal coupling and surface subsidence prediction methods. Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13(8). P. 5192.https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085192

Sakhno I., Sakhno S., Petrenko A., Barkova O., Kobylianskyi B. Numerical simulation of the surface subsidence evolution caused by the flooding of the longwall goaf during excavation of thin coal seams. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023. Vol. 1254. P. 012057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135733

Zhang C., Tu S., Zhao Y. Compaction characteristics of the caving zone in a longwall goaf: A review. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2019. Vol. 78. P. 27. https://10.1007/s12665-018-8037-7

Barla G. Rock anisotropy: Theory and laboratory testing. Rock mechanics / ed. by L. Müller. Springer-Verlag. 1972. P. 131–169.

Cazacu O., Cristescu N.D., Sha J.F., Henry J.P. A new anisotropicfailure criterion for transversely isotropic solids. Mechanics of Cohesive-Frictional Materials. 1998. Vol. 3. P. 89-103.

Oka F., Kimoto S., Kobayashi H., Adachi T. Anisotropic behaviorof soft sedimentary rock and a constitutive model. Soils and Foundations. 2002. Vol. 42 (5). P. 59-70.

Khanlari G., Rafiei B., Abdilor Y. Evaluation of strength anisotropy and failure modes of laminated sandstones. Arab J Geosci. 2015. Vol. 8(5). P. 3089-3102. https://10.1007/s12517-014-1411-1

Sakhno I.G., Molodetskyi А.V., Sаkhno S.V. Identification of material parameters for numerical simulation of the behavior ofrocks under true triaxial conditions. Naukovyi Visnyk NHU. 2018. Vol. 5. P. 48–53. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-5/4

Published

2026-05-30