COMPARING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF STEELMAKING TECHNOLOGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2080/2025-3-23Keywords:
Metallurgical industry, green metallurgy, environmental impact, CBAM, DRI, EAF, transformationAbstract
The study focuses on the pressing issue of environmental responsibility in the steel industry. Traditional steel production methods are associated with significant greenhouse gas emissions and have a negative impact on the environment. As environmental regulations are tightening and public interest in sustainable development is growing, the search for new, more environmentally friendly solutions is becoming increasingly important. Innovation in the steel industry is not just a trend, but a necessity for the industry’s long-term survival. The proposed comprehensive approach to modernising steel production will help “ZAPORIZHSTAL” PJSC remain a major player in the steel market. Government support and investments in the development of green technologies are key to the successful transformation of the industry. The article analyses the potential of innovative technologies such as direct reduction of iron (DRI) and electric arc furnaces (EAF) to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions and improve energy efficiency. It also examines the role of carbon capture, use and storage technologies in minimising the negative impact on the climate. The results of the study show that the introduction of green technologies not only helps to reduce the environmental burden, but also opens up new opportunities for the export of Ukrainian steel to European markets, where environmental standards are increasingly important, and helps to facilitate rapid integration into the European Union and establish Ukraine as a sustainable player in the steel market. In addition, the transition to green metallurgy will help improve Ukraine’s energy security by reducing dependence on energy imports. The introduction of innovative solutions helps to increase the competitiveness of steelmaking companies in the global market and ensure the long-term sustainability of the industry.
References
Chang Y., Wan F., Yao X., Wang J., Han Y., Li H. Influence of hydrogen production on the CO2 emissions reduction of hydrogen metallurgy transformation in iron and steel industry. Energy reports. 2023. Vol. 9. P. 3057–3071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.083
Okosun T., Nielson S., Zhou C. Blast furnace hydrogen injection: investigating impacts and feasibility with computational fluid dynamics. Jom. 2022. Vol. 74, no. 4. P. 1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05177-4
Gerasev A., Bundschuh P., Schenk J., Viertauer A., Trummer B., Arth G., Rossler R., Reisinger P. Evaluation of the Potential for Reduction of CO2 Emissions at the Secondary Metallurgy. RHI AGRHI Technology Center Leobenvoestalpine Stahl Linz GmbH. 2016. No. 1. P. 28–34. URL: https://pure.unileoben.ac.at/en/ publications/evaluation-of-the-potential-for-reduction-of-co2-emissions-at-the
Tang J., Chu M., Li F., Feng C., Liu Z., Zhou Y. Development and progress on hydrogen metallurgy. International journal of minerals, metallurgy and materials. 2020. Vol. 27, no. 6. P. 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2021-4
Mauret F., Baniasadi M., Saxén H., Feiterna A., Hojda S. Impact of hydrogenous gas injection on the blast furnace process: a numerical investigation. Hojda. Metallurgical and materials transactions B. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-023-02822-4
Lan C., Hao Y., Shao J., Zhang S., Liu R., Lyu Q. Effect of H2 on blast furnace ironmaking: a review. Metals. 2022. Vol. 12, no. 11. P. 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111864
Magacho G., Espagne E., Godin A. Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries. Climate policy. 2023. P. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758
Beschkov V., Ganev E. Perspectives on the development of technologies for hydrogen as a carrier of sustainable energy. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, no. 17. P. 6108. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16176108
Gołdasz A., Matuszewska D., Olczak P. Technical, economic, and environmental analyses of the modernization of a chamber furnace operating on natural gas or hydrogen. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2022. Vol. 47, no. 27. P. 13213–13225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.090
Neacsa A., Eparu C. N., Stoica D. B. Hydrogen–Natural gas blending in distribution systems–an energy, economic, and environmental assessment. Energies. 2022. Vol. 15, no. 17. P. 6143. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176143
Junjie Y. Progress and future of breakthrough low-carbon steelmaking technology (ULCOS) of EU. International journal of mineral processing and extractive metallurgy. 2018. Vol. 3, no. 2. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmpem.20180302.11.
ULCOS: ultra-low CO2steelmaking / K. Meijer et al. Ironmaking & steelmaking. 2009. Vol. 36, no. 4. P. 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1179/174328109x439298
Ishaq H., Dincer I., Crawford C. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: challenges and opportunities. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.149
Ahmed S. F. et al. Sustainable hydrogen production: technological advancements and economic analysis. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.029
Zou C., Li J., Zhang X., Jin X., Xiong B., Yu H., Liu X., Wang S., Li Y., Zhang L., Miao S., Zheng D., Zhou H., Song J., Pan S. Industrial status, technological progress, challenges, and prospects of hydrogen energy. Natural gas industry B. 2022. Vol. 9, no. 5. P. 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ngib.2022.04.006
Rampai M. M., Mtshali C. B., Seroka N. S., Khotseng L. Hydrogen production, storage, and transportation: recent advances. RSC advances. 2024. Vol. 14, no. 10. P. 6699–6718. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra08305e