CALCULATION OF THE RISK OCCUPATIONAL INJURY DUE TO FATIGUE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2080/2026-7-33

Keywords:

fatigue, injury risk, Swiss Cheese model, workers, critical infrastructure, martial law

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify and mathematically substantiate the cause-and-effect relationship between the development of fatigue in workers of critical infrastructure facilities and the increase in the level of occupational injuries. Methodology: An adapted Swiss cheese model was used to calculate the probability of failure of protective barriers. It was found that the probability of failure of barriers increases by 4–16 times under the influence of military and psychosocial factors. The article provides a quantitative assessment of the risk of occupational injuries of critical infrastructure workers caused by chronic fatigue. An adapted Swiss cheese model was used for modeling in combination with the Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) and Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) methods. The probabilities of failure of organizational, physiological, diagnostic, and technical and supervisory barriers in the stressful conditions of martial law were determined. The coefficients of error probability growth under the influence of military, meteorological, and psychosocial factors were calculated. It was established that the total risk of injury reaches 3.6–16.8% per critical operation, which corresponds to a critically unacceptable level. Results: The overall risk of injury is 3.6–16.8% per critical operation, which corresponds to a critically unacceptable level. It is proven that the current labor organization (60-hour work week, no rotation) is the main determinant of the increase in injury rates in the energy sector of Ukraine in 2025–2026. Scientific novelty: Adaptation of the «Swiss Cheese Model» model to assess the convergence of military, meteorological and psychosocial factors. Practical value: Recommendations have been developed to preserve personnel potential, including mandatory rotation, medical screening, and revision of Law No. 2136-IX.

References

Alexander T. M. Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) and Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). NASA Technical Reports Server, 2017. URL: https://ntrs.nasa. gov/citations/20170010256

Basner M., Mollicone D., Dinges D. F. Validity and sensitivity of a brief psychomotor vigilance test (PVTB) to total and partial sleep deprivation. Acta Astronautica. 2011. Vol. 69, № 11–12. P. 949–959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.07.015

Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Fatigue Risk Management System Handbook. Canberra, 2013. URL:https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-12/fatigue-risk-management-systems-handbook.pdf

Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Fatigue risk management system (FRMS) handbook. Canberra, 2021. URL: https://www.casa.gov.au/resources-and-education/publications/manuals-handbooks-and-templates/fatigue-risk-management-system-frms-handbook

Federal Aviation Administration. AC 120-103A - Fatigue Risk Management Systems for Aviation Safety. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013. URL: https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_circular/ac_120-103a.pdf

Hasibuan R. P. S., Fadillah S. Human Reliability Assessment Analysis with Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) Method on Sterilizer Station at XYZ Company. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 847. P. 012042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/847/1/012042

Sprajcer M., Thomas M. J. W., Sargent C., Crowther M. E., Boivin D. B., Wong I. S., Smiley A., Dawson D. How effective are Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS)? A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2022. Vol. 165. P. 106398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106398 (doi.org in Bing)

Jo D., Kim H. The Influence of Fatigue, Recovery, and Environmental Factors on the Body Stability of Construction Workers. Sensors. 2024. Vol. 24, № 11. P. 3469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113469

Sieber W. K., Chen G. X., Krueger G. P., Lincoln J. E., Menéndez C. C., O'Connor M. B. Research gaps and needs for preventing worker fatigue in the transportation and utilities industries. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2022. Vol. 65, № 11. P. 857–866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23346

Summers A. E. Introduction to layers of protection analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2003. Vol. 104, № 1–3. P. 163–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00278-2

Wiegmann D. A., Wood L. J., Cohen T. N., Shappell S. A. Understanding the “Swiss Cheese Model” and its application to patient safety. Journal of Patient Safety. 2022. Vol. 18, № 2. P. 119–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000900

Published

2026-05-30