DETERMINATION OF THE ROUGHNESS IMPRINT COEFFICIENT IN COLD ROLLING WITH CONSIDERATION OF THE RELATIVE WORK ROLL SERVICE LIFE AND THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ROLLING EMULSIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2080/2026-7-16Keywords:
cold rolling, tandem mill, surface roughness, work rolls, rolling emulsion, roughness transfer coefficient, relative roll wear, micro-reliefAbstract
This article examines the topical issue of quantitatively assessing the formation of the surface micro-relief of steel strip during cold rolling on continuous tandem mills. It has been established that the key factors determining the roughness of the finished rolled product are the surface condition of the work rolls in the final stand and the tribological conditions determined by the type of rolling emulsion. Since experimental control of intermediate roughness under industrial conditions is limited, the authors propose a universal approach to assessing the roughness imprint coefficient Kprint. The research methodology is based on the introduction of the relative roll operating time parameter L, which allows data to be standardised across campaigns of varying durations. A comparative analysis was carried out of five types of rolling emulsions: the base ‘Universal-1TS-M’ and four imported equivalents (Lubro, Quakerol, Rollub, Trenoil). For the base process, reference linear relationships were established between roll wear and changes in strip roughness. The scientific novelty of the work lies in defining Kprint not as a static quantity, but as a dynamic function of the relative service life of the rolls. Three calculation methods were compared: the arithmetic mean, the instantaneous integral, and the ratio of integrals of functions (‘energy’ measure). The results showed that integral methods provide a smoother estimate, levelling out local inhomogeneities, although they yield values 15–30% lower than discrete measurements. The ranking of emulsions by their ability to imprint roughness proved to be identical for all methods, confirming the reliability of the proposed models. The obtained functional dependencies can be integrated into mathematical models of lubricant film formation to optimise rolling conditions and improve metal surface quality.
References
B. Ma, A.K. Tieu, C. Lu, Z. Jiang. An experimental investigation of steel surface characteristic transfer by cold rolling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2002. Vol. 125–126, P.657-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00377-1.
R. Ahmed , M.P.F Sutcliffe. Identification of surface features on cold-rolled stainless steel strip. Wear. 2000. Vol. 244, Issues 1–2, P. 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00442-7.
John G. Lenard. The effect of roll roughness on the rolling parameters during cold rolling of an aluminum alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2004. Vol. 152, Issue 2, P. 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jmatprotec.2004.03.026.
Sören Andersson, Edwin Salas-Russo. The influence of surface roughness and oil viscosity on the
transition in mixed lubricated sliding steel contacts. Wear. 1994. Vol.174, Issues 1–2, P. 71-79.
Kukhar V., Spichak O., Pashynskyi V., Malii K., Balalayeva E., Marchenko I., Tuzenko O. A data-driven approach to the selection of sustainable emulsions for cold-rolled steel production. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2025. Vol. 23. Issue 2. P. 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15862796.
Спічак О. Ю., Кухар В. В., Широкобоков В. В. Вплив параметрів відпалу у ковпакових печах на чистоту поверхні холоднокатаного прокату. International scientific conference “MININGMETALTECH 2024 – The mining and metals sector: integration of business, technology and education” : conference proceedings (November 28–29, 2024. Riga, the Republic of Latvia). Riga, Latvia : “Baltija Publishing”, 2024. Vol. 1.
Р. 186–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-506-8-65.
Кухар В. В., Спічак О. Ю., Пашинський В. В., Малій Х. В. Випробування емульсолів для холодної прокатки на сажоутворення при відпалі рулонів. Обробка матеріалів тиском. 2024. № 1(53). С. 116–128. DOI: 10.37142/2076-2151/2024-1(53)116.
Кухар В. В., Спічак О. Ю., Балалаєва О. Ю., Марченко І. Ф. Розробка математичних моделей змін концентрації емульсій та вмісту механічних домішок у технологічних рідинах з використанням пакету MATLAB для обробки експериментальних даних. Вісник Приазовського державного технічного університету. Серія: Технічні науки. 2024. Вип. 49. Т. 1. С. 100–109. DOI: 10.31498/2225-6733.49.1.2024.321216.
Kijima H. Influence of roll radius on roughness transfer in skin-pass rolling of steel strip. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2014. Vol. 214, Issue 5. P. 1111–1119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.12.019.
Miranda A. C. M., Neto C. L., Labiapari W. da S., Pereira P. H. R., Cetlin P. R., Arias A. R. Study of the coefficient of friction and forward slip in cold rolling of stainless steel AISI 430 in Sendzimir mills. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2025. Vol. 34. P. 912-923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.106.
Çolak B., Ahmed Z., Özakin B., Kurgan N. An experimental investigation into roughness transfer in asymmetrical rolling of steel strips. Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2023. Vol. 13, No. 3. P. 1070–1089. DOI:10.31466/kfbd.1289221.
Cavallari M., Gaboardi P., McWhirter R., Perassolo M., Trevisan C. New surface finishes for cold rolling mills. Proceedings of the 2nd ESTAD Conference (METEC 2015). Düsseldorf, Germany, June 15–19, 2015.Düsseldorf, 2015. P. 1–6.




