ANALYSIS OF THE HIERARCHICAL LEVELS OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY IN ORGANIZATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-2080/2026-6-31Keywords:
risk, safety levels, hierarchy, safety culture, management system effectiveness, occupational safety, workers’ healthAbstract
Purpose. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the interrelation between the state, corporate, and individual levels of occupational safety within organizations. Methods. A systems analysis approach was employed to determine the role of the state in establishing occupational safety requirements and enforcement mechanisms, which serve as a driving force for actions at both the corporate and individual levels. Results. The study presents a thorough examination of the interdependencies between the state, corporate, and individual levels of occupational safety management. It is demonstrated that the effectiveness of an occupational health and safety (OHS) management system can be achieved only through the synergistic interaction of these three levels. This synergy is reflected in the revision and consolidation of regulatory frameworks at the state level, including the removal of outdated and contradictory norms and alignment with modern risk-oriented approaches; the demonstration of leadership, commitment to safety, and allocation of necessary resources to foster a culture of safety at the corporate level; and the promotion of proactive employee engagement in all safety-related matters at the individual level. The study identifies key enabling factors for a robust OHS management system, such as harmonization with EU regulations, the proliferation of ISO 45001:2018 standards, and ongoing technological development. The transition from a compliance-driven model of occupational safety to a dynamic, ISO 45001-integrated system represents not merely a technical update, but a fundamental shift in corporate safety philosophy. It is shown that employee decisions and behavior are influenced by the level of safety culture, which must ensure the balanced development of five key components: informed culture, reporting culture, just culture, flexible culture, and learning culture. Scientific Novelty. The novelty of this research lies in its systemic approach to occupational safety, which is conceptualized not as a collection of isolated regulations, but as an interrelated hierarchy encompassing state, corporate, and individual levels. This perspective substantiates the conclusion that only coordinated and coherent actions across all three levels can ensure an effective OHS management system. Practical Value. The practical significance of the study is reflected in the development of recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of the entire occupational safety hierarchy. These recommendations support a shift toward risk-based supervision, moving away from formal inspection checklists to focus on evaluating the functional performance of safety management systems.
References
Analysis of Common Requirements of the ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 45001:2018 Standards. Research, Society and Development, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. e15811427160, 2022. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27160.
Skład A. Assessing the impact of processes on the Occupational Safety and Health Management System’s effectiveness using the fuzzy cognitive maps approach. Safety Science. 2019. 117. 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.021.
Bochkovskyi A. Development of stochastic models for occupational hazards risk assessment. Bulletin of Lviv State University of Life Safety. 2019. 19. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.32447/20784643.19.2019.07.
Claxton G., Hosie P., Sharma P. Toward an effective occupational health and safety culture: A multiple stakeholder perspective. J Safety Res. 2022 Sep. 82. 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 May 2. PMID: 36031280.
Мезенцева І. О., Кузьменко О. О., Труш О. О., Вамболь С. О. Аналіз причин виробничого травматизму та шляхів його зниження в сучасних реаліях. Проблеми охорони праці в Україні. 2023. 39(3–4). 8–14. https://doi.org/10.36804/nndipbop.39-3-4.2023.8-14
Tsopa V., Cheberyachko S., Sharovatova O., Deryugin O., Lapko K. Concepts of Occupational Protection, Occupational Safety and Health and Well-Being of Employees at Work. Social Development and Security. 2025. 15(4). 116–125. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.4.11
Mohd Zafar Shaikh. The Influence of Safety Culture on Reducing Workplace Accidents in Industrial Settings. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering. 2024. 12(10s). 716. URL: https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/7857
Rosa María Cañaveras Perea, Ángel Tejada Ponce, María Pilar Sánchez González, How to prevent 3 million deaths worldwide: a systematic review of occupational accident research–a factor- and cost-based approach, European Journal of Public Health, Volume 35, Issue 1, February 2025, Pages 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae197
Duryan M., Smyth H., Roberts A., Rowlinson S., Sherratt F. Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: Cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May. 139. 105496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105496. Epub 2020 Mar 18. PMID: 32199157.
Saxena V. Human Factors Analysis in Occupational Accident Prevention. In: Varde, P.V., Vinod, G., Joshi, N.S. (eds) Advances in Risk and Reliability Modelling and Assessment. ICRESH 2024. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3087-2_28
Shabani T., Jerie S., Shabani T. A comprehensive review of the Swiss cheese model in risk management. Saf. Extreme Environ. 2024. 6. 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42797-023-00091-7
Yuan S., Reniers G., Yang M. Dynamic-risk-informed safety barrier management: An application to costeffective barrier optimization based on data from multiple sources. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2023 83. 105034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105034
Bikram R. Pandey. Rethinking occupational health and safety principles–a systems perspective. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 2025. 55. 6. 1362–1383. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2024.2333555
Салманов А. Г. Правове забезпечення охорони праці / А. Г. Салманов. Журн. заступника головного лікаря. 2017. № 2. С. 32–47.
Закон України № 2694-XII (1992). Україна. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2694-12#Text.
ДСН 3.3.6.037-99. Санітарні норми виробничого шуму, ультразвуку та інфразвуку. Затверджено постановою Головного державного санітарного лікаря України від 01.12.1999 № 37. Київ: Міністерство охорони здоров’я України, 1999. 28 с.
Sisca Mayang Phuspa, Dian Afif Arifah, Rindang Diannita, Norwahida Yaakub, Azizan Ramli, Mohd Shahril Abu Hanifah, Azim Azuan Osman, Nur Fazhilah Abdul Razak (2025), Dimensions of Safety Practices in Educational Institutions: A Scoping Review Toward Boarding School Adaptation, The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health: Vol. 14 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v13i2.2024.252-260
Rosa Anaya-Aguilar, Manuel Suárez-Cebador, Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero, & Fuensanta Galindo-Reyes. Delphi assessment of occupational hazards in the wineries of Andalusia, in southern Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. 196. 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.008.
Ключка Ю. Кореляція класу об’єкта підвищеної небезпеки, маси небезпечних речовин та його ризику. Social Development and Security. 2025. 15(3). 149–162. https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2025.15.3.15
Bochkovskii A. P., Gogunskii V. D. Development of the method for the optimal management of occupational risks, Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2018. 3/3(93). 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.132596.
Гринчук Ю. С., Шемігон О. І., Вихор М. В. Контроль як функція державного управління: економіко-правова сутність та механізм застосування. Ефективна економіка. 2019. № 4. URL: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.4.3 (дата звернення: 17.11.2025).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




